Medical Credentialing Service for Solo Providers vs. Group Practices
Medical credentialing service is the process that allows healthcare providers to get recognized by insurance companies so they can bill for services and receive payment. Without it, a provider can see patients but won’t be reimbursed by payers. Accordingly, both solo providers and group practices must go through credentialing, but the requirements, workload, and timelines vary depending on the practice structure.
Table of Contents
Group Practices vs. Solo Providers — Quick Overview
Solo providers only need to credential themselves. By contrast, group practices must manage credentialing for every clinician under the group’s tax ID. Consequently, the scale of work is larger for groups, even though the requirements are similar. This makes solo credentialing faster, while groups gain the benefit of shared payer contracts.
Medical Credentialing Service for Solo Providers: What It Covers
For solo practitioners, the medical credentialing service process requires submitting a single application package to multiple payers for provider enrollment. This typically includes state medical licenses, DEA registration, malpractice insurance, a complete work history, and an updated CAQH profile that insurers use to confirm provider details.
Since only one provider is credentialed, the process is more straightforward and usually finalized within 60–90 days. However, Medicare may take closer to 120 days, while commercial payers often range between 80–100 days, depending on documentation completeness and compliance standards.
Credentialing for Group Practices: How It Works
In group practices, the medical credentialing process operates at both the organizational and provider level. The practice itself is identified by a Type 2 NPI associated with its Tax ID or EIN, while each individual clinician must hold a Type 1 NPI. For successful provider enrollment, every clinician’s documentation—including state licenses, DEA registration, malpractice insurance, CAQH profile, and work history—must be accurately maintained and submitted to payers.
Unlike solo credentialing, which requires a single application, group practices must complete one for each provider. As a result, a practice with 10 clinicians must submit 10 separate applications. Any missing or outdated documentation can delay payer approval, contract activation, and ultimately reimbursement for the entire group. To better understand the distinction between credentialing and enrollment, see provider credentialing vs. enrollment.
How the Credentialing Process Works for Solo and Group Providers
The medical credentialing process begins with collecting provider data such as licenses, DEA registration, malpractice coverage, CV, and references. This information is uploaded or updated in CAQH and submitted to payers. Insurers then conduct primary source verification, checking credentials with state boards, the DEA database, malpractice carriers, and the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB).
For solo providers, once verification is complete, payer contracts are issued under the individual’s Type 1 NPI and Tax ID. In group practices, each clinician’s profile must be approved and linked to the organization’s Type 2 NPI and EIN. Payers also maintain a provider roster for groups, requiring regular updates. Any incomplete documents or expired credentials can pause approvals, delaying enrollment and reimbursement.
NPIs in Credentialing: Individual (Type 1) vs. Group (Type 2)
The National Provider Identifier (NPI) is a critical element in the medical credentialing process, as it connects providers and organizations to payer contracts and billing systems.
Type 1 NPI → Assigned to individual providers. Solo practitioners use this identifier to bill directly under their personal Tax ID. Each clinician in a group practice must also maintain their own Type 1 NPI for enrollment and compliance.
Type 2 NPI → Assigned to organizations or group practices. This identifier is tied to the group’s Tax ID (EIN) and is used when billing payers on behalf of the entire practice. Each provider’s Type 1 NPI is linked to the group’s Type 2 to establish proper billing and contract association.
This distinction is critical: using the wrong NPI combination during provider enrollment or claims submission can result in rejected claims, contract delays, or compliance issues. Maintaining precise NPI records ensures smoother payer approvals and uninterrupted insurance reimbursement.
Tax ID/EIN and Linking Providers to Payers
Within the credentialing process, payers require alignment between the provider’s National Provider Identifier (NPI) and the appropriate Tax ID or Employer Identification Number (EIN) to validate billing. Group practices bill under an organizational EIN tied to a Type 2 NPI, with each clinician’s Type 1 NPI linked for enrollment and reimbursement. Solo providers, in contrast, connect their Type 1 NPI directly to a personal Tax ID. Any inconsistency between NPI and Tax ID details can lead to claim denials and delays in payer participation.
Documents Required for Both Solo and Group Credentialing
To complete the medical credentialing process, providers must submit a set of standardized documents that allow payers to verify qualifications, confirm compliance, and approve participation in insurance networks. Whether applying as a solo provider or part of a group practice, these records form the foundation of provider enrollment. Any Missing or outdated records can delay contracts and reimbursement. For more strategies on reducing these delays, see how to speed up your physician credentialing.
Active State License → Confirms the provider is legally authorized to practice.
DEA Registration → Needed if prescribing controlled substances.
Malpractice Insurance → Must meet payer coverage requirements.
Work History / CV → Used to verify experience and training.
Updated CAQH Profile → Standardized source of provider data for most insurers.
Board Certifications / Hospital Privileges (if applicable) → Confirms specialty expertise or hospital access.
NPI → Type 1 for individuals; both Type 1 and Type 2 in group settings.
Tax ID (EIN or SSN) → Identifies the billing entity for reimbursement.
Documentation Differences in Solo and Group Credentialing
Solo Providers → Submit documents once, linked to their Type 1 NPI and personal Tax ID.
Group Practices → Each provider must submit their own documentation, and it must also be tied to the group’s Type 2 NPI and EIN.
Roster Maintenance → Groups must keep an updated provider roster with payers, while solos only manage their individual profile.
Even small errors—like expired DEA or incomplete CAQH—can push applications back weeks.
Timelines Compared: Solo vs. Group Practices
The duration of the credentialing process depends largely on practice structure and payer processing speed. Solo providers usually complete enrollment faster, while group practices face extended timelines because each provider must be verified individually.
While most commercial insurers process credentialing in about 90–120 days, Medicare can take up to 150 days, and Medicaid varies by state. Group practices often wait longer because even one pending provider can delay roster approval for the entire group. Avoid delays by following a structured process for applications. See A Provider Credentialing Contracting Checklist for practical steps.
“Waiting for credentialing approval feels longer than waiting for a refund check.”
Costs and Staffing: In-House vs. Outsourced
Managing medical credentialing service involves continuous tasks such as CAQH attestations, malpractice renewals, payer roster updates, and revalidations. Solo providers usually outsource to credentialing vendors, with flat fees often ranging from $200–$500 per application, as the administrative workload can be difficult to manage alone.
Group practices, on the other hand, frequently hire credentialing coordinators or build in-house teams, with average annual salaries for specialists ranging from $45,000–$65,000. Larger practices often adopt a hybrid approach—outsourcing initial enrollments while using internal staff for compliance tracking, renewals, and payer follow-ups. This strategy balances cost efficiency with better control over ongoing provider enrollment. For more insights on how credentialing connects to billing, see what is credentialing in medical billing.
Pros and Cons of Group vs. Solo Credentialing
Choosing between solo and group credentialing depends on practice goals, administrative capacity, and payer relationships. Each approach has distinct benefits and challenges that influence credentialing efficiency and long-term provider enrollment outcomes.
In summary, solo credentialing offers faster approvals and greater independence but lacks the contracting advantages of larger groups. Group credentialing takes longer and requires more resources but provides stronger negotiating power with insurers and streamlined payer contracts across multiple clinicians.
Payer Rules: Medicare, Medicaid, and Commercial Plans
Credentialing timelines and requirements vary significantly across Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial payers, and understanding these differences is critical for both solo providers and group practices.
Medicare → Requires initial provider enrollment and formal revalidation every five years to maintain active status. The process often takes 90–150 days, with delays possible during high-volume periods.
Medicaid → Operates under state-specific credentialing rules, generally processed within 60–120 days. Each state may also require additional documentation or compliance checks.
Commercial Payers → Most insurers complete insurance credentialing within 90–120 days, although some networks take longer depending on contract volume and verification requirements.
For group practices, the process is more complex since every clinician must be credentialed individually and tied to the group’s Tax ID and Type 2 NPI before contracts become active. Any pending application within the group can delay billing and insurance reimbursement for the entire practice. (For a more detailed comparison, see payer-specific credentialing: Medicare vs. commercial insurance
Transitioning Between Group and Solo Practice
Switching between group practice credentialing and solo provider credentialing requires a complete reset of payer enrollment. These transitions are more than administrative; they affect Tax ID usage, NPI alignment, payer contracts, and insurance reimbursement.
From Group to Solo → The provider must establish a new Tax ID (EIN), update their Type 1 NPI, and apply for payer contracts under the new entity. This requires re-submitting documents, re-attesting CAQH, and waiting for payer approval before billing begins.
From Solo to Group → A provider joining a group must link their Type 1 NPI to the group’s Type 2 NPI and EIN. Each payer updates its contracts to reflect the new association, often requiring credentialing verification before claims can be billed.
Medical credentialing service is an essential step for both solo providers and group practices to participate in payer networks. Solo providers often move through the process more quickly, while group practices handle greater complexity but gain broader contracting benefits. With proper documentation and timely updates, credentialing supports smooth reimbursement and stable payer relationships.
At MBW RCM, we handle the entire medical credentialing service process—ensuring your applications are accurate, up to date, and processed without unnecessary delays. Contact us today to optimize your credentialing and keep your practice connected to payers.
FAQs: Medical Credentialing Service for Solo & Group Practices
Request for Information
Whether you are a solo provider or part of a group practice, credentialing needs vary. If you’d like expert guidance on timelines, payer rules, or enrollment strategies, we’re here to help. Schedule a consultation today by filling out the form below, and our team will connect with you to discuss the right solutions for your practice.
