The Cost of Manual Prior Authorizations: Is Your Staff Spending Too Much Time on the Phone?
The cost of manual prior authorizations is often underestimated. Many healthcare teams accept long phone calls, repeated follow-ups, and payer delays as “part of the job.” In reality, these manual tasks consume valuable staff time, slow down operations, and increase the risk of claim rejections.
Most of these issues start early—during the Patient Registration Process. If prior authorization requirements are not identified and managed correctly at registration, problems appear later as denied claims, delayed payments, and frustrated patients.
As authorization requirements continue to expand, organizations must ask a simple question: Is manual prior authorization work costing more than it should?
Why Manual Prior Authorizations Create Operational Strain
Prior authorizations are no longer limited to a few high-cost procedures. Payers now require them for imaging, therapies, medications, and many outpatient services. This means authorization work is now a routine part of patient access and registration.
When authorizations are handled manually, staff often spend hours:
Calling payer help lines
Waiting on hold
Submitting paperwork through multiple portals
Tracking approvals manually
Following up on pending requests
These tasks pull staff away from other critical registration activities, such as eligibility checks and patient communication.
Healthcare organizations that use prior authorization services within patient access are better able to manage these demands without overwhelming their teams.
How Manual Authorization Work Impacts the Patient Registration Process
The Patient Registration Process sets the stage for everything that follows. It is where insurance information is verified, payer rules are identified, and authorization needs are flagged.
When authorization workflows are manual:
Registration takes longer
Patient scheduling is delayed
Records may be incomplete at the time of service
Errors are more likely to occur
Over time, these gaps increase the likelihood of claim rejections and rework for billing teams.
Industry data supports this concern. Research highlighted by the American Medical Association shows that most providers report increased time spent on prior authorizations, with staff often managing approvals daily instead of focusing on patient-facing tasks.
“Manual prior authorization workflows are one of the biggest sources of frustration for patient access teams,”
says Dr. Sofia Reyes, MD, a revenue cycle strategist.
The Real Cost of Manual Prior Authorizations
The cost of manual prior authorizations goes beyond staff time. It affects multiple areas of the revenue cycle.
How Authorization Errors Lead to Claim Rejections
Authorization-related mistakes are a common cause of claim rejections. These issues usually occur when authorization details are incomplete, incorrect, or missing.
Common examples include:
Authorization not obtained before the visit
Authorization approved for the wrong service
Authorization number not added to the claim
Authorization expired before the date of service
Delays are often unavoidable with manual workflows. Understanding how long prior authorization can take for medications and procedures helps explain why claims are frequently submitted before approvals are finalized.
When claims are rejected for authorization reasons, payment is delayed and appeals require additional time and effort.
Phone-Based Authorization Workflows Slow Everything Down
Phone-based authorization workflows may seem simple, but they create delays and inconsistency.
Common challenges include:
Long hold times
Different answers from different payer representatives
Verbal approvals that are not clearly documented
No easy way to track authorization status
These issues increase the cost of manual prior authorizations and make it harder for teams to stay organized.
Organizations that follow best practices for efficient prior authorization in revenue cycle management reduce these risks and improve coordination across teams.
Why Reducing Manual Work Matters
Reducing manual authorization work is not just about saving time. It helps:
Improve registration accuracy
Reduce claim rejections
Speed up claim submission
Improve cash flow
Reduce staff burnout
When authorization management is handled correctly at the front end, billing teams spend less time fixing errors and more time focusing on revenue optimization. Insights on patient online registration systems show how strong front-end processes reduce friction and support faster, cleaner billing outcomes.
Strengthening Authorization Management at Registration
Healthcare organizations are improving results by treating authorization management as part of the Patient Registration Process, not a separate task.
Effective approaches include:
Identifying authorization needs during scheduling
Tracking approvals in one central system
Aligning documentation with payer requirements
Ensuring authorization details are entered before claims are submitted
Many organizations also rely on dedicated prior authorization support to reduce manual work and maintain consistency.
Also Read: Efficient Prior Authorization Services in Washington for Medical Practices
Final Thoughts
The cost of manual prior authorizations affects staff, patients, and revenue. Long phone calls and manual follow-ups slow down the Patient Registration Process and increase the risk of claim rejections.
By simplifying authorization workflows and addressing requirements early, healthcare organizations can reduce rework, improve accuracy, and protect reimbursement.
Manual processes may feel familiar—but they don’t have to be permanent.
FAQs: Manual Prior Authorizations and Claim Rejections
Request for Information
If you’re experiencing issues with prior authorizations or claim processing, we’re here to help. Fill out the form with your questions or challenges.Our specialists will follow up with relevant insights.
