Case Study: Resolving Ophthalmology NPI/TIN Mismatches to Prevent Out-of-Network Losses

A New York ophthalmology practice with 2 providers faced unexpected disruptions in reimbursement due to hidden credentialing and billing setup issues. What began as routine claim submissions quickly escalated into a major financial setback—impacting network status, payments, and overall cash flow

Case Study: Resolving Ophthalmology NPI/TIN Mismatches to Prevent Out-of-Network Losses

With losses mounting, MBW RCM stepped in to uncover the root cause and guide the practice toward recovery. Read the full case study below to discover what went wrong—and how $825,847 in revenue was brought back on track.

Customer Situation

The practice had no standardized documentation to guide staff on credentialing rules, payer-specific requirements, or how to choose the correct NPI/TIN for each scenario. Without a clear reference, team members relied on assumptions, often selecting the wrong billing entity or network classification.

Because of this lack of clarity, BCBS claims were routinely submitted under incorrect NPI/TIN combinations. The repercussions were significant:

  • All BCBS HMO claims were denied outright

  • BCBS PPO claims were paid at reduced out-of-network rates

  • Payments were routed to outdated or incorrect pay-to addresses

  • AR increased dramatically as staff attempted to correct and appeal recurring denials

Every incorrect submission added to the financial burden. The practice struggled to keep up with rising denials, mounting AR, and dwindling cash flow, creating a cycle of operational frustration and uncertainty.

Challenges

MBW RCM’s audit revealed several critical issues that contributed to the revenue loss.

Credentialing & Submission Mismatch

Although BCBS credentialed the provider under the Group NPI/TIN, Nextech and Trizetto were submitting claims under the Individual NPI, causing BCBS to categorize them as out-of-network.

Lack of Internal Documentation

No written guidelines existed for billing rules, entity selection, or network usage. Staff were unaware of which provider preferences applied to which services, leading to inconsistent claim submission patterns.

Incorrect PM & EDI Configuration

The system configurations contained outdated or incorrect:

  • Network indicators

  • Taxonomy codes

  • NPI/TIN mappings

  • Pay-to addresses

These systemic errors meant that even corrected claims were resubmitted incorrectly, perpetuating the problem.

Revenue Leakage and Delays

Correcting credentialing mismatches with BCBS and updating EDI enrollment required 3 months. During this time, the practice continued to experience denials and underpayments, worsening AR aging and delaying cash flow even further.

Solution

MBW RCM approached the issue with a comprehensive remediation plan. They began with a full credentialing, PM, and EDI audit to uncover all discrepancies between BCBS enrollment records and the practice’s system configuration.

Once identified, MBW RCM:

  • Corrected all NPI/TIN mappings to match BCBS credentialing

  • Updated network indicators and billing entity assignments

  • Validated taxonomy codes and pay-to details

  • Reconfigured Trizetto EDI enrollment for clean, accurate claims

  • Ensured Nextech mapping reflected the correct group enrollment

Before resubmitting any claims, MBW RCM performed a complete validation to ensure accuracy.

To prevent future issues, they created clear internal documentation outlining:

  • When to bill under Group vs. Individual NPI

  • Provider-specific in-network and out-of-network rules

  • How to submit surgical services requiring different billing status

  • Steps for verifying credentialing combinations before submission

Claims were placed on temporary hold until BCBS confirmed and activated the corrected setup, preventing additional losses while changes were pending.

Results

Once credentialing and system corrections went live, claims began processing cleanly. MBW RCM systematically resubmitted every affected BCBS claim, allowing the practice to recover $825,847 in previously denied or underpaid revenue.

The outcomes included:

  • Accurate network billing, eliminating NPI/TIN mismatch denials

  • Higher clean-claim rates, reducing work for staff

  • Faster, predictable reimbursement, improving cash flow

  • Clear workflows and documentation, reducing provider and staff confusion

  • Long-term stability, preventing future credentialing-related revenue loss

What began as a costly credentialing and billing crisis ultimately became a turning point. With expert intervention, accurate system setup, and standardized guidance, the practice regained confidence in its billing operations and secured a more reliable revenue cycle.

 
 

Schedule a consultation

NPI/TIN mismatches and provider setup errors can lead to out-of-network payments and unnecessary revenue loss. MBW RCM helps ophthalmology practices correct credentialing and billing configurations to prevent denials and improve reimbursement.

To learn how we can help your practice eliminate network-related issues and strengthen financial performance, fill out the form below — our team will contact you soon.

 
 
Previous
Previous

Role of Effective Billing in Orthopedic Practice Revenue

Next
Next

Facility vs. Physician: Clarifying the Most Confusing Rules in Emergency Department Billing