Case Study: Improving Reimbursement Accuracy Through Comprehensive Oncology Documentation

Case Study: Improving Reimbursement Accuracy Through Comprehensive Oncology Documentation

Customer Situation

An Illinois-based oncology practice was experiencing frequent denials and delays in reimbursement due to incomplete and unclear documentation. Providers relied heavily on handwritten notes, which often lacked critical details such as:

  • Specific diagnosis codes

  • Type and site of neoplasm (primary vs. metastasis)

  • Complications, prognosis, and relevant history

As a result, coders struggled to assign accurate codes, leading to rejections, delayed billing, and increased accounts receivable (AR) days.

Challenges

Our audit identified several documentation and process-related issues:

  • Illegible handwritten notes that omitted complete details of primary and metastasis sites.

  • Difficulty identifying the neoplasm’s origin (e.g., whether metastasis was primary, secondary, or in remission).

  • Frequent coding clarifications due to unclear documentation of malignancy extent, complications, or pain management services.

  • Diagnosis codes lacking specificity, especially regarding primary, secondary, and overlapping sites.

  • High denial rates caused by lack of clarity in documentation, resulting in revenue leakage.

  • Delays in billing due to excessive back-and-forth with providers, contributing to charge lag and longer AR days.

Solution

The practice outsourced its billing processes to MBW RCM. We implemented a comprehensive revenue cycle transformation plan that addressed both provider documentation and coding accuracy.

Medical Records Audit

Best Practices in Oncology Coding
Best practices in Oncology Coding
  • Clearly document the type of neoplasm (primary, secondary, disseminated, overlapping).
  • Provide comprehensive service details in every encounter.
  • Ensure pre-authorization to avoid insurance denials.
  • Capture details of treatment intent (malignancy-directed vs. symptom management).
  • Document complications from chemotherapy, radiation, or surgical procedures.
  • Record chemotherapy start and end times alongside concurrent services.
  • Specify whether neoplasms are active, excised, or in remission.
  • Include symptoms, signs, and abnormal findings related to the neoplasm.
  • Conducted detailed audits to ensure medical records supported high-level coding and accurate sequencing.

  • Placed claims on hold when documentation was incomplete or lacked diagnostic specificity (e.g., unclear distinction between primary vs. secondary metastasis).

  • Emphasized the importance of scanning detailed medical reports for more precise coding.

    • Delivered targeted provider education on documenting:

    • Cancer status and metastasis

    • Complications and concurrent conditions

    • Chemotherapy start and end times

    • Comprehensive service details for timely filing and reimbursement

Claims Tracking and Feedback Loop

  • Monitored physician-specific trends and provided feedback on claims requiring additional details.

  • Kept claims on hold until complete information was received, minimizing denials.

  • Shared recurring documentation issues with providers in real-time to improve the clean claim ratio.

Results

  • Streamlined Documentation: Accounts pending site-specific diagnosis dropped from 18% (Dec ’24) to 3% (Mar ’25).

  • Improved Clean Claim Ratio: Issues with medical records were significantly reduced.

  • Increased Collections: 15% improvement in collections - Average monthly collections grew from $161,000 to $172,800.

  • 15% improvement in coding accuracy

  • 13% reduction in client queries/feedback reducing rework.

 
 

Schedule a consultation

Our focus on resolving denials by identifying and systemically eliminate the root causes, helps our clients improve revenue by a minimum of 20%. To learn about how we can help you reduce denials and improve revenue cycle metrics, please fill the form below, and we will be in touch.

 
 
Next
Next

Case Study: Preventing Oncology Denials with Smarter Coding Practices